© Media Watch 10 (3) 723-736, 2019
ISSN 0976-0911 E-ISSN 2249-8818
DOI: 10.15655/mw/2019/v10i3/49685
Disability, Deficiency, and Excess: A Cinematic Construction of Disability in Popular Odia Cinema
Santosh Kumar Biswal
Symbiosis Institute of Media and Communication, India
Abstract
Cinema for social change is not a new approach. Odia cinema, earlier known as Oriya cinema, has been intrinsically connected to the essence of Odia language and culture in the Indian state of Odisha. Since the inception of Odia cinema, it has been endeavoring to send social messages by employing visual communication for social change and development. Despite riding on the path of social and attitudinal changes, the films representing the disabled characters have raised eyebrows concerning its commitments to outcomes. As the spirit of rights activism and changing public discourses on disability on the rise, Odia cinema industry is pushed to face a decisive test. The disdain for disability in entertainment media is unraveled, and the politics of treating the disabled has become flawed. The current study has attempted to understand the cinematic construction in the light of the model, gender, identity, and societal approach towards disability issues.
Keywords: Odia cinema, disability, representation, marginalized, identity, gender, culture, media, India
References
Barnes, C. (1992). Discrimination In The Media. Retrieved from March 2, 2019, www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Barnes/Effecting%20changepdf
BBSR Pulse. (2019, January 19). Political Narratives in Odia Cinema. Retrieved from July 12, 2019, http://bbsrpulse.com/2019/01/political-narratives-in-odia-cinema/
Biswal, S. K. (2017). Representation of Women with Disabilities in Hindi Cinema. Media Watch, 8(2), 67-74.
Biswal, S. K. (2019, January 1). Time to honour their battles.The Telegraph, 14. Retrieved from March 2, 2019, https://epaper.telegraphindia.com//epaperimages//01012019//01012019-MD-HR-14.PDF
Camilleri-Zahra, A. (2016). Disability, gender, and the trajectories of power. Disability & Society, 31(7), 983-985. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1198550
Chahdi, C. (2018). Revisiting Binarism: Hollywood’s Representation of Arabs. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 83, 19-30. Retrieved from January 17, 2019, https://www.scipress.com/ILSHS.83.19.pdf
Cheu, J. (2009). Seeing Blindness on Screen: The CinematicGaze of Blind Female Protagonists. The Journal of Popular Culture, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2009.00691.x
Cheu, J. (2010). Seeing Blindness On-Screen: The Blind, Female Gaze. In S. Chivers and N. Markotic (Eds.), The Problem Body: Projecting Disability on Film (pp. 67-82). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
Cumberbatch, G., & Negrinne, R. (1992). Images Of Disability On Television. London, NY: Routledge.
Darke, P. (2010). No Life Anyway: Pathologizing Disability on Film. In S. Chivers and N. Markotic (Eds.), The Problem Body: Projecting Disability on Film (pp. 97-108). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
Deakin, N., & Bhugra, D. (2012).Families in Bollywood cinema: Changes and context. International Review of Psychiatry, 24(2), 166-172.
Devereaux, M. (1995). Oppressive Texts, Resisting Readers, and the Gendered Spectator: The “New” Aesthetics. In, P. Z. Brand and C. Korsmeyer (Eds.), Feminism and tradition in aesthetics (pp. 121-141). University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.
Dutt, R. (2014). Behind the curtain: women’s representations in contemporary Hollywood. Dissertation submitted to the Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from March 1, 2019, http://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/msc- dissertations/2013/112-Dutt.pdf
Dastidar, S. G., & Elliott, C. (2019).The Indian film industry in a changing international market. Journal of Cultural Economics, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-019-09351-6
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.
Hahn, H. D., & Belt, T. L. (2004). Disability identity and attitudes toward cure in a sample of Hall, S. (1997). Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.
Hevey, D. (1993). From Self-Love to the Picket Line: Strategies for Change in Disability Representation. Disability & Society, 8(4), 423-429.
Hick, S., Fook, J., & Pozzuto, R. (2005). Social Work: A Critical Turn. Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.
Jaggi, R. (2011). The Great Indian Television Soap Opera: Issues of Identity and Socio-cultural Dynamics. Media Asia, 38(3), 140-145.
Jaggi, R., & Thirumurthy, P. (2015). Cut, Clip, and Appropriate – A Critical Analysis of Suppression of Alternative Discourse in Indian Cinema through Censorship. Amity Journal of Media & Communication Studies, 4(1-2), 7-15.
Jain, J. (2018). Bit of Barfi, Sip of Margarita: Disability and Sexuality in Hindi Films. Antyajaa: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 3(1), 1-12.
James, S. (2016, March 14). Disability In Film Genres: Exploring The Body And Mind. Retrieved from March 2, 2019, https://www.filminquiry.com/disability-in-film-genres/
Kaplan, E. A. (2000). ‘Is the Gaze, Male?’. In E. Ann Kaplan (Ed.), Feminism, and Film (pp. 119-38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaur, S., & Sharma, V. (2016). Weepies Going Dirty and Machos Doing Masti: Unveiling the Female Chauvinist Pigs in Indian Cinema. Media Watch, 7(3), 370-380. DOI: 10.15655/mw/2016/v7i3/48551
Kapur, S. P., & Sharma, V. (2017). Blurring the Binaries, Blending the Gender: A Transition from Male Masculinity to Female Androgyny in Hindi Cinema. Media Watch, 8(2), 287-294.
Kim, E. (2010). “A Man, with the Same Feelings”: Disability, Humanity, and Heterosexual Apparatus in Breaking the Waves, Born on the Fourth of July, Breathing Lessons, and Oasis. In S. Chivers and N. Markotic (Eds.), The Problem Body: Projecting Disability on Film (pp. 131-158). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
Kothari, J. (2012). The future of Disability Law in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Kumar, H., & Pandey, G. J. (2017). Deconstruction of Symbols of Reality in Hindi Cinema: A Study on Calendar Girls and Haider. Media Watch, 8(3), 388-400. DOI: 10.15655/mw/2017/v8i3/49144
Kumar, V., & Dwivedi, K. (2017). Sociology of Disability in India: A Victim of Disciplinary Apathy. Social Change, 47(3), 373–386.
Kusuma, K. S. (2018). Female Body and Male Heroism in South Indian Cinema: A Special Reference to Telugu Cinema. Language in India, 18(6). Retrieved from August 5, 2019, http://www.languageinindia.com/june2018/kusumafemaleactorsmaleheroismindianmovies.pdf
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18. Norden, M. (2001). The Hollywood discourse on disability: Some personal reflections. In A. Enns & C. Smit (Eds.), Screening disability: Essays on cinema and disability (pp. 19- 31). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
Quinlan, M. M., & Bates, B. R. (2009). Bionic woman (2007): Gender, disability, and cyborgs. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 9(1), 48-58.
Rajamani, I. (2017). Feeling anger, compassion and community in popular Telugu cinema. The Indian Economic and Social History Review, 54(1), 103–122.
Rao, S. (2010). “I Need an Indian Touch”: Glocalization and Bollywood Films. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 3(1), 1-19.
Rosenberg, A. (2016, September 7). In Hollywood, people with disabilities are almost nonexistent. The Washington Post. Retrieved from March 2, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/act-four/wp/2016/09/07/in-Hollywood-people- with-disabilities-are-almost-nonexistent/?utm_term=.9a9b2bf3a1c0
Saikia, N., Bora, J. K., Jasilionis, D., & Shkolnikov, V. M. (2016). Disability Divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 Census. PLoS ONE, 11(8). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0159809
Saxena, R., & Abhishek (2015). Realigning Business Strategy to Cater to Customers with Disability (CwD) in the Indian Context.VIKALPA: The Journal for Decision Makers, 40(2), 121-131.
Sooryamoorthy, R. (2007). Behind the Scenes: Making Research Films in Sociology. International Sociology, 22(5), 547–563.
Valentine, J. (2001). Disabled Discourse: Hearing Accounts of Deafness Constructed Through Japanese Television and Film. Disability & Society, 16(5), 707-727.
Walters, S. D. (1995). Visual pressures: on gender and looking. In Material Girls: Making Sense of Feminist Cultural Theory (pp. 50-66). Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Weisberger, A. (1992). Marginality and its Directions, Sociological Forum, 7(3), 425-446. Whittington-Walsh, F. (2002). From Freaks to Savants: Disability and Hegemony from The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939) to Sling Blade (1997). Disability & Society, 17(6), 695-707.
Whittington-Walsh, F. (2002).From Freaks to Savants: Disability and hegemony from The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939) to Sling Blade (1997). Disability & Society, 17(6), 695–707. DOI: 10.1080/0968759022000010461
Williams, L. (2009). Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess. Film Genre Reader, 3, 141–59. World Health Organization. (2011). Health topics: Disabilities. Retrieved from May 12, 2012, http://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/
Yee, J. (2005). Critical anti-racism praxis: The concept of whiteness implicated. In S. Hick, J. Fook and R. Pozzuto (Eds.), Social work, a critical turn (pp. 87–104). Toronto: Thompson.
Yengde, S. (2018). Dalit Cinema. Dalit Cinema. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. DOI: 10.1080/00856401.2018.1471848
Yukie, B. (2015). The0Representation of Disability0in Movies: Disability as a Problem of Communication. Japanese0Journal of Communication Studies, 43(2), 109-124.
Zhang, L., & Haller, B. (2013). Consuming Image: How Mass Media Impact the Identity of People with Disabilities. Communication Quarterly, 61(3), 319–334.
Santosh Kumar Biswal (Ph.D., Osmania University, 2016) is an Assistant Professor with Symbiosis Institute of Media and Communication, Symbiosis International
(Deemed University), Pune. His research interests include development communication, disability, human rights and citizen journalism.