What is Political about Political Economy:A Rejoinder to the Fuchs-Winseck Debate

What is Political about Political Economy: A Rejoinder to the Fuchs-Winseck Debate

SCOTT TIMCKE¹ & DEREK KOOTTE²
¹School of Communication, Simon Fraser University, Canada
²Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Abstract
This paper uses the Winseck-Fuchs debate as a case study in assessing how value preferences shape definitions, predicate logic, and axiomatic reasoning, and in turn influence the analysis of institutions. The study identify and contrast the explanatory power behind different modes of institutional analysis often applied in the study of communication in advanced capitalist societies. Thereafter the study attend to how these modes account for capacity, frame collective actions problems, take account of trade-offs and coalition building, as well as describe behaviour of and within institutions. In the second half of the paper, the study use critical political economic methodologies to examine the ideological coloring of these modes. The study highlight features often overlooked in reductive treatments of states and corporate conglomeration and seek to supplement them with a more sensitive political economic analysis. In this respect, the researchers think there is much scope for communication researchers to contribute to the general analysis of the advantages and problems of political assessment of governance as it relates to the media more broadly.

Keywords: Institutional analysis, political economy, media conglomerations, Dwayne Winseck, Christian Fuchs

References

Ansell, C. (2006). Network Institutionalism in Rhodes, R. A. W. Binder, S. &Rockman, B. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bannerman.S. &Haggart.B. (2015) Historical Institutionalism in Communication Studies. Communication Theory 25(1) pp 1-22
Boltanski.L. &Chiapello. E. (2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso
Castells.M. (2011) A Network Theory of Power.International Journal of Communication 5 (2011), 773–787
Cherrier, B. (2010).Rationalizing Human Organization in an Uncertain World: Jacob Marschak, from Ukrainian Prisons to Behavioral Science Laboratories.History of Political Economy 42(3) pp 443-467
Dewinter. J. &Kocurek (2014) Games, Gamification, and Labour Politics. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds 6(2)
Eagleton, T. (1991).Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.
Fleury, J. B. (2012) Wandering through the Borderlands of the Social Sciences: Gary Becker’s Economics of Discrimination, History of Political Economy 44(10) pp 1-40
Freeman, L. C. (2004) The Development of Social Network Analysis: A study in the sociology of science, Vancouver: Empirical Press
Freeman. L. C. (2014) The Development of Social Network Analysis – with an Emphasis on Recent Events in Scott. J. & Carrington. P. J. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage.
Fuchs, C. &Winseck, D. (2011).Critical Media and Communication Studies Today. A Conversation, Triple C, 9(2)
Fuchs. C. &Mosco. V. (2012) Marx is Back: The importance of Marxist Theory and Research for Critical Communication Studies, tripleC 10(2): 127-140
Giocoli.N. (2003). Modeling Rational Agents: From Interwar Economics to Early Modern Game Theory Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Hall R. B. &Biersteker, T. J. (2002). The Emergence of Private Authority in the International System in Hall R. B. &Biersteker, T. J. (Eds.) The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hands, D. W. (2014) Paul Samuelson and Revealed Preference Theory.History of Political Economy 46(1) pp 85-116
Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist Institutionalism in Rhodes, R. A. W. Binder, S. &Rockman, B. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kanter, R. M. (2012). The Institutional Logic of Great Global Firms.in Costa, J. E. R. & Marti, J. M. R. (Eds.) Towards a New Theory of the Firm: Humanizing the Firm and the Management Profession. Bilbao: FundaciónBBVA
Katz, Y. (2012). Noam Chomsky on Where Artificial Intelligence Went Wrong, The Atlantic, 1 November 2012, http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/noam-chomsky-on-where-artificial-intelligence-went-wrong/261637/
Kellner, D. (1995). Media Communications vs. Cultural Studies: Overcoming the Divide. Communication Theory, 5: 162–177
Kline, S. (2003) Media Effects: Redux of Reductive? Participations: International Journal of Audience Research 1(1)
Lecours, A. (2005). New Institutionalism: Issues and Questions in Lecours, A. (Ed.) New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ohanyan.A. (2012) Network Institutionalism and NGO Studies.International Studies Perspectives 13(4) 366–389
Olson, M. (1965).The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Pereto, V. (1902).les Systems Socialistes II, Paris.
Piketty.T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Prey. R. (2012) The Network’s Blindspot: Exclusion, Exploitation and Marx’s Process-Relational Ontology. tripleC 10(2): 253-273
Roemer, J. (1985). ‘Rational Choice’ Marxism: Some Issues of Method and Substance, Economic and Political Weekly, 20(34)
Sanders, E. (2006). Historical Institutionalism in Rhodes, R. A. W. Binder, S. &Rockman, B. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shepsle, K. (2006). Rational Choice Institutionalism in Rhodes, R. A. W. Binder, S. &Rockman, B. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skocpol, T. (1985). ‘Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research’ in Evans, P. Rueschemeyer, D. &Skocpol, T. (Eds.) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Thelen.K. (1999).Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.Annual Review of Political ScienceVol 2: 369-404
Tilly. C. (1984) Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
Wagner, R. (1966). Pressure groups and political entrepreneurs.Papers on Non-Market Decision Making, 1: 161–70
Weingast, B. R. &Wittman, D. A. (2006). The Reach of Political Economy, in Weingast, B. R. &Wittman, D. A. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Winseck, D. & Jin, D. Y. (Eds.) (2011). The Political Economies of Media: The Transformation of the Global Media Industries. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Winseck, D. (2011). The Political Economies of Media and the Transformation of the Global Media Industries in Winseck, D. & Jin, D. Y. (Eds.) (2011).The Political Economies of Media: The Transformation of the Global Media Industries. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Wright, E. O. (1989). Rethinking, once again, the concept of class structure, in Wright, E. O., (Ed.) The Debate on Classes, London: Verso
Wright, E. O. (1997). Class Counts: Comparative studies in class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Wright. E. O. (2015) Class and Inequality in Piketty, Contexts 14(1) pp58-61

Dr. Scott Timcke recently defended his PhD dissertation at the School of Communication, Simon Fraser University. He works in the areas of social theory, political philosophy, and global inequality studies.
Derek Kootte studies political science at the University of British Columbia. His research focuses on governance and development policy in emerging economies, and economic inequality.